Asbestos has been recognized for decades as a major health hazard. Still, it remains in use across select industries in the United States. Now, new developments have raised serious concern: the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) may reconsider its long-anticipated ban on chrysotile asbestos.
This potential reversal could delay or even halt progress made in public health protections, especially for workers in high-risk occupations. While over 50 countries have already banned all forms of asbestos, the U.S. continues to allow limited usage—leaving countless individuals vulnerable to exposure and its long-term effects. This article explores the impact of chrysotile asbestos, the EPA’s recent decisions, and what this could mean for those affected by asbestos-related diseases.
Chrysotile, commonly referred to as “white asbestos,” is the last type of asbestos still legally used in the U.S. It is frequently found in:
Although it’s banned in most of the developed world, chrysotile continues to pose serious risks for workers and surrounding communities.
Inhalation or prolonged exposure to chrysotile asbestos fibers is directly linked to life-threatening illnesses, including:
An estimated 40,000 deaths occur annually in the U.S. due to asbestos-related diseases.
In a long-awaited move, the EPA formally banned chrysotile asbestos in 2024 under the Biden administration. While the phase-out period allowed some industries up to 12 years to fully comply, the ruling was seen as a public health milestone.
However, in June 2025, the EPA, under the Trump administration, announced a reconsideration of the ban. The agency is conducting a 30-month review, specifically targeting exemptions for chlorine production and the installation of asbestos-containing gaskets—potentially allowing continued use in these sectors.
Public health organizations and advocacy groups have strongly criticized the EPA’s reversal. Linda Reinstein, of the Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization, described the move as a “dangerous step backward.”
Although asbestos production ended domestically in 2002, the U.S. still imports it—mainly from Brazil—keeping workers in construction, manufacturing, and emergency response jobs at risk. Even more concerning, secondhand exposure can occur when fibers are carried home on workers’ clothing, unintentionally putting families in harm’s way.
Despite this potential setback, legislative momentum is not lost. Senator Jeff Merkley has continued pushing for a complete ban on asbestos imports and usage.
For meaningful change, public awareness and action are essential. Workers, families, advocacy groups, and concerned citizens can all play a role in ensuring safety and accountability.
The reconsideration of the asbestos ban could delay vital protections for thousands of Americans. Staying informed, raising your voice, and knowing your rights are key steps in navigating this complex and ongoing issue.
If you or someone you know has been exposed to asbestos—whether through work, military service, or secondary contact—exploring your legal and medical options is crucial. Support advocacy efforts, stay updated on policy changes, and continue to demand accountability for preventable exposures.
